主页 > 国内 >

流星花园2

TikTok Shouldn’t Be TikDoc_我的网站

焦糖

一 |     

As government scrutiny and even some statewide TikTok bans trickle in, concerns about the app’s impact on youth mental health are often repeated. Among the concerned are the bereft parents of a teen who killed himself last year, reportedly after seeing self-harm content on TikTok.
While states and some organizations decide whether TikTok poses enough danger to warrant a ban, I want to sound the alarm about an online mental health risk that’s even more chronic and not limited to TikTok: an epidemic of self-diagnosis, fueled by social media, that’s leading to improper treatment, missed treatment and the trivialization of serious mental health conditions.
If there’s a silver lining to the COVID-era mental health crisis, it’s that people seem more willing than ever to talk about mental health struggles with friends, with colleagues and sometimes to the whole world online. Even better, they’re willing to get help. The percentage of adults aged 18 to 44 seeking mental health treatment rose significantly during the first years of the pandemic, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
If you spend any time online, you can’t miss the new candor about mental health conditions. TikTok and Instagram influencers share their struggles and diagnoses on camera. In recent years, executives on LinkedIn have shared photos of antidepressant medication with the hashtag #PostYourPill. Actor-singer-beauty mogul Selena Gomez launched an entire content platform focused on “mental fitness.” Conditions such as anxiety disorder, ADHD and OCD are not only being de-stigmatized, in some contexts, they’re trending.
Open discussion of mental health is undoubtedly a good thing when it eradicates shame, results in people feeling less alone or motivates somebody to seek needed professional care. But in this new era of openness, we risk oversimplification and even trivialization of complex medical conditions, increasing the risk of overtreatment for some, undertreatment for others and overall mistreatment of people exposed to a cacophony of mental health conversations online but lacking access to balanced, authoritative information and quality clinical care.
Let’s say a young woman perusing TikTok sees an influencer sharing that he has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, then – thanks to social media algorithms – over the next week, more ADHD-related content appears in the young woman’s feed. Some of the symptoms feel relatable, so she does a YouTube search on ADHD. After watching a few of the thousands of videos on the topic, she decides that she herself has ADHD.
This is not unusual. Some therapists at Talkspace, where I serve as the chief medical officer, report they have clients coming to sessions with more complex or specific self-diagnoses. Whereas a client might have said, “I think I’m depressed,” a few years ago, now more are saying, “I think I have borderline personality disorder” or “I think I’m on the autism spectrum.”
Such self-diagnosis can be dangerous. When a social media user becomes convinced that they have a mental health disorder, it can lead them to seek inappropriate treatments. They may announce their self-diagnosis to a primary care provider who doesn’t have sufficient mental health expertise to appropriately evaluate the presenting symptoms. Or the patient may wind up using a telehealth provider to get a prescription medication that’s not helpful or is dangerous. In the case of the hypothetical young woman above, she’d likely be seeing ads for ADHD-focused telehealth prescribers within days, if not minutes, of initially engaging with ADHD influencers.
Diagnosing a mental health disorder isn’t as simple as checking off a list of symptoms. Many healthy people experience symptoms of a mental health condition, but the true measure of whether those symptoms merit a diagnosis and treatment is whether they impair the individual’s ability to function. That determination requires working with a licensed mental health professional to evaluate the frequency, intensity, severity and specificity of those symptoms, and understand them within the broader context of life events, stressors and family history.
A “reel” diagnosis needs a real-life one
To address the “TikTok effect” and stop the dangers of self-diagnosis, mental health professionals must meet people where they are: online and actively searching for answers, inadvertently creating a curated feed.
Social media companies and other platforms with user-generated content have a responsibility to create guardrails that ensure clinically-vetted and accurate information is within reach of anybody seeking content about mental health conditions.
For example, if you enter the search terms “depression” or “suicide” into Instagram, you’re offered a list of mental health resources. However, searches related to specific conditions like OCD, ADHD and Tourette’s link directly to memes and user-generated videos of (to put it generously) mixed quality. Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve seen how quickly social platforms could flag content related to COVID or vaccines and direct people to CDC information on those topics. Therefore, it does not seem unreasonable to expect the same for content around sensitive mental health topics.
When somebody hears about a condition online and believes, correctly or not, that it affects them, they are more likely to feel worried, triggered or even distraught. Thankfully, that same technology can quickly link them with mental health care without stigma or stress and allow them to find real answers under a professional’s guidance – if they land at a responsible, high-quality source of tele-mental health. We recently revamped our own site to provide clinical insights from a dedicated team of licensed, practicing clinicians to add dimension to the spectrum between experiencing symptoms and having a condition.
Unfortunately, some telehealth services are all too quick to prescribe medications, including controlled substances, based solely on answers to online questions. At Talkspace, I am personally committed to our policy of not prescribing controlled substances online. When our board-certified psychiatrists and psychiatric nurse practitioners do prescribe medication, it is only after live video consultations and a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation.
Because mental health conditions are so much more complex than what can be captured by a checklist of symptoms, I’m wary of any company that prescribes without live consultations. When digital health companies feed into the misconception that everyone with depressive symptoms is clinically depressed or anyone who’s easily distracted has ADHD, they risk hurting more people than they help.
At a time when it’s all too easy for both the worried well and people with serious mental health conditions to self-diagnose online, it’s imperative that both social media and digital health companies do everything possible to direct vulnerable audiences to trustworthy information and comprehensive, ethical care.
。    
在全球大战略格局迅猛变化的今天,东亚地区的国家也在积极调整自己的地缘战略布局。近日,韩国外交部长赵兑烈突然访华,引发了外界广泛的关注。与此同时,解放军也将出发访日,展开为期7天的交流活动。这一系列令人眼前一亮的外交动作似乎预示着亚太格局即将发生骤变!
赵兑烈此行于13日至14日进行,这次访问不仅是赵兑烈秉任外长后首次访华,更是近六年来首位到访中国的韩国外长。鲜为人知的是,在赵兑烈之前的韩国外长曾定下“秉持顺序,应有中国访韩”的规则,但赵兑烈选择打破这个规则,毫不犹豫地飞往北京,与中国进行面对面的交流,可见目前韩国的状况不容乐观。

二 |

自2008年起,中日韩三国每年举办一次三方会议,目的是促进三国在经济贸易、文化等多个领域的交流与合作。但随着时间的推移,自2019年12月最后一次召开,中日韩三国之间的峰会便未能再次举行,陷入了停顿状态。
即使是2023年11月召开的中日韩三国外长会议,也没有改善三国关系,当时我国外长王毅在会谈结束后并没有按照常规参加联合发布会,直接离开了。所以,这次赵兑烈的访华之行,极有可能是绝对中日韩三国峰会再次召开的催化剂。

三 |

无独有偶,据日媒报道,14日至20日,日本自卫队与中国解放军开展交流活动,届时将有20名中国军官访日,并参观日本的军事基地。值得一提的是,在日本自卫队去年7月访华后,解放军原定去年9月进行回访。然而,由于日方去年8月决定向太平洋排放核污染水,中国就取消了计划中的回访。

四 | 如今,这种交流活动的重启被看作是中日两国关系回暖的标志,不只是限于解放军与日本自卫队之间的互动。

回头来看可以发现日韩两国的举动似乎与朝鲜半岛的局势和美国大选有关。
在朝鲜半岛,由于美韩重新执行的高压威慑政策,引发了朝鲜的强硬反击,全新型导弹武器的开发和战备的强化,使得半岛局势呈现螺旋式上升的趋势,这让韩国着急了,想让美国帮帮忙,但此时的美国已经干了不少“糊涂事”,综合实力和国际影响力不断下滑,自身都难保了。
俄乌冲突爆发后,美欧国家对俄罗斯展开全方位的制裁,但都没有达到预期的效果,反而推动了俄方提升自身经济实力。同时,美国在中东事务中的一边倒,一票否决了巴勒斯坦正式加入联合国的决议,遭到了143个国家的反对。

五 | 更是让韩国、日本等盟友受尽逼迫,纷纷升级对中国的半导体出口限制,使自身利益饱受损害。

与此同时,对于日韩而言最大的变数即将来临——美国大选,特朗普极有可能再次当选,这就意味着日韩与拜登政府的“盟友外交”彻底作废了,两国面临重开一局的风险,最重要的是重开的这句里面他们必须在遭受一次“经贸保护主义”和“孤立主义”的冲击,这对于日韩来说是一个不小的冲击。
不论是为了预防朝鲜半岛局势的进一步恶化,还是为了提防特朗普的“美国优先”政策,日韩都必须在现在这个紧急关头,加强和中国的沟通,给自己找一条退路出来。
中日韩三国的对话已经开始,预示着一个新的三边峰会可能即将召开,那么东北亚乃至亚太地区的格局将发生重大变化。若美国未能维持与日本和韩国在限制中国方面的合作,其构建亚太地区针对中国的围堵战略恐怕难以实现,同时地区中的紧张局势也可能显著降低。

六 |

当然,这一切还需要时间的检验。但从目前来看,韩国与中国的对话,以及日本对中国军官的邀请,都表明了一个事实:在全球战略格局中,无论是韩国、日本还是中国,他们都意识到了要摆脱过去的对抗模式,转向构建和平而有序的东亚新格局的必要性。

七 |

Current article:http://5xck2bw.chuanshaonianmokuanchouzhei.sbs/2yz/9wa.html

Published on:00:00:00


【责任编辑:admin】
最新文章
热门文章